
Here’s a little question to see if you remember the different causes of conjugated and unconjugated bilirubinemia
While examining the gums of a 25 year old patient, a yellowish discoloration of the oral mucosa and sclera is noted. Laboratory tests show a significant increase in unconjugated bilirubin. Which of the following disorders is most likely the cause of this patient’s abnormalities?
A. A stone in the bile duct
B. Carcinoma of the head of the pancreas
C. Pancreatic pseudocyst
D. Sickle cell disease
E. Hepatocellular carcinoma
Let’s review a little before we get to the question.
Bilirubin is a breakdown product of heme (which, in turn is part of the hemoglobin molecule that is in red blood cells). It is a yellow pigment that is responsible for the yellow color of bruises, and the yellowish discoloration of jaundice.
When old red cells pass through the spleen, macrophages eat them up and break down the heme into unconjugated bilirubin (which is not water soluble). The unconjugated bilirubin is then sent to the liver, which conjugates the bilirubin with glucuronic acid, making it soluble in water. Most of this conjugated bilirubin goes into the bile and out into the small intestine. (An interesting aside: some of the conjugated bilirubin remains in the large intestine and is metabolized into urobilinogen, then sterobilinogen, which gives the feces its brown color! Now you know.)
So: if you have an increase in serum bilirubin, it could be either because you’re making too much bilirubin (usually due to an increase in red cell breakdown) or because you are having a hard time properly removing bilirubin from the system (either your bile ducts are blocked, or there is a liver problem, like cirrhosis, hepatitis, or an inherited problem with bilirubin processing).
The lab reports the total bilirubin, and also the percent that is conjugated vs. unconjugated. If you have a lot of bilirubin around and it is mostly unconjugated, that means that it hasn’t been through the liver yet – so either you’ve got a situation where you’e got a ton of heme being broken down (and it’s exceeding the pace of liver conjugation), or there’s something wrong with the conjugating capacity of the liver (like a congenital disorder where you’re missing an enzyme necessary for conjugation – for example, Gilbert syndrome).
If you’ve got a lot of bilirubin around and it’s mostly conjugated, that means it’s been through the conjugation process in the liver – so there’s something preventing the secretion of bilirubin into the bile (like hepatitis, or biliary obstruction), and the bilirubin is backing up into the blood.
Back to our question. Let’s go through each answer and see what kind of hyperbilirubinemia these disorders would cause.
A. A stone in the bile duct. If big enough, a stone here could block the excretion of bilirubin into the bile. The bilirubin would already be conjugated, so this would be a conjugated bilirubinemia.
B. Carcinoma of the head of pancreas. This could also cause biliary obstruction, similar to A. (An important aside: it’s nice when pancreatic carcinomas announce themselves this way, because it may allow for earlier detection of the tumor. Unfortunately, this is uncommon. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is usually silent until the tumor is very large and possibly metastatic.)
C. Pancreatic pseudocyst. Same idea as A and B.
D. Sickle cell disease. Sickle cell anemia is a type of hemolytic anemia. It could be a cause of unconjugated bilirubinemia, if the hemolysis is massive enough. If it’s just a low level of hemolysis, the liver could probably keep up, and you’d get a conjugated hyperbilirubinemia.
E. Hepatocellular carcinoma. This would fall into the category of blocking excretion of bilirubin. The bilirubin would already be conjugated – so this would be a conjugated hyperbilirubinemia.
So: since A, B, C and E produce only conjugated hyperbilirubinemia, the answer is D, sickle cell disease.

Atherosclerosis is responsible for half the deaths in the US today! If you get it in your coronary arteries, you’re at risk for myocardial infarction; if it’s in your carotid arteries, you’re at risk for stroke. And lest you think this is something you don’t need to worry about until you’re old, you should know that this process starts very, very early in life – somewhere during childhood – and you just can’t tell you have it until you suddenly start getting nasty symptoms (doctors call this the “clinical horizon,” which sounds strangely picturesque). Scary.
There are lots of risk factors for getting atherosclerosis. They are divided into two groups: major risk factors (which are known for sure to cause atherosclerosis) and lesser or uncertain risk factors (which have less of an effect, or are as yet unproven). Let’s take a look at both groups.
Major risk factors
Some of the major risk factors for atherosclerosis you are simply stuck with, and there is not a thing you can do about them. These include:
- increasing age (atherosclerosis is more common as people get older)
- gender (At younger ages, males are more at risk. Premenopausal women are relatively protected; after menopause the risk in women increases and eventually exceeds the risk in males.)
- family history
- genetic abnormalities (lots of these probably exist; many aren’t fully understood).
The good news is that there are several major risk factors that you can potentially do something about. These include:
- Hyperlipidemia (best thing to do is have a high level of HDL cholesterol, which actually scavenges lipids and removes them from atherosclerotic plaques, and a low level of LDL, which is the “bad” cholesterol that makes up part of the plaques.
- Hypertension (there’s no one right number, but it should be at least below 140 systolic and 90 diastolic)
- Cigarette smoking (smoking potentiates the other risk factors)
- Diabetes (patients with diabetes mellitus have an increased amount of atherosclerosis at a younger age)
- C-reactive protein level (this is a serum marker of inflammation; the higher the level, the greater the risk for atherosclerosis)
Lesser or uncertain risk factors
Then there are a bunch of other things that may be related to an increased risk, but the data is not yet conclusive. These include:
- Obesity
- Physical inactivity
- Stress
- Postmenopausal estrogen deficiency
- High carbohydrate intake
- Lipoprotein (a) (an altered form of LDL that seems to be independently associated with increased risk of atherosclerosis)
- Trans-fat intake
- Chlamydia pneumoniae infection (Chlamydia pneumoniae and other bugs have been detected in plaques but not in normal arteries, and there are increased antibody titers to C. pneumoniae in patients with more severe atherosclerosis. But a causal link hasn’t been established.)
So: don’t smoke; eat well (not too many carbs, no trans fats), exercise, and maintain a healthy weight; keep your blood pressure and lipids within the normal range; if you have diabetes, work to keep it as controlled as possible; don’t get Chlamydia pneumoniae. Oh, and don’t get all worried about it – stress is another potential risk factor!
Image credit: Hamed Masoumi (http://www.flickr.com/photos/hamedmasoumi/2266654041/), under cc license.

If you read this post about hemolytic disease of the newborn, you already know the answer: it’s used for determining the amount of fetal blood that has backed up into the mom’s circulation.
It’s usually done for the purpose of determining Rhogam dose. You need to make sure you give enough Rhogam to suppress the mom’s immune response. If there has been a little bleed, you give a little; if there has been a big bleed, you need to give more. Take a look at this chart if you want to know exact doses.
Here’s how it’s done:
1. Prepare blood smear from mom’s blood.
2. Expose blood smear to acid bath (this removes adult hemoglobin, which is acid-sensitive) but not fetal hemoglobin.
3. Stain smear. Fetal cells appear dark pink; maternal cells look like “ghosts.” Here’s what this looks like:

4. Count lots of cells and report percentage of cells that are fetal (specifically: you count the number of fetal blood cells per 50 low power fields. If you see 5 cells per 50 low power fields, that’s equivalent to a 0.5 mL fetomaternal hemorrhage).
If you want to get really fancy, you can look for fetal blood cells using flow cytometry. Using a sample of mom’s blood, apply an anti-HbF (fetal hemoglobin) antibody, and then run the sample through the flow cytometer. In the little printout, look for cells that stain intensely with HbF: these are baby’s cells! A few of mom’s cells will have weak HbF staining – this is normal in adults.
Top image credit: adamr.stone (http://www.flickr.com/photos/adamrstone/3098924060/) via cc license.

Hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) is a disease in which there is hemolysis in a newborn or fetus caused by blood-group incompatibility between mother and child. (more…)

Q. I have been studying for boards and have run into an issue. I am wondering what markers are used to test if a patient has had an MI. (more…)

Here’s a nice boards – type question that requires you to put together some clinical and laboratory data to form a diagnosis, and then describe what the blood smear would look like. (more…)

We’ve been talking a lot about hemolytic anemias – we talked about how to figure out if your patient has a hemolytic anemia, and we talked about the DAT as a test that you would do to determine whether your patient’s hemolytic anemia falls into the immune category (warm or cold autoimmune hemolytic anemia) or the non-immune category. (more…)

Okay, we’ve talked a lot about the DAT, and how it’s used to determine whether your patient’s hemolytic anemia is due to immune causes (warm or cold autoimmune hemolytic anemia). (more…)

We talked recently about the direct antiglobulin test, which is a test used to find out whether a hemolytic anemia is immune-related or not. So let’s take a look at the immune hemolytic anemias! (more…)
Recent Comments