Q. I’m a medical student, and I wonder if you have some good tips about how to tell tell apart mononucleosis from AML on a blood smear?
A. Great question! It would obviously be important to be able to distinguish between infectious mononucleosis (a benign disorder caused by EBV) and acute myeloid leukemia (a malignant disorder characterized by proliferation of myeloblasts). I have some general guidelines that I would use to tell those two entities apart, but first let’s review what you’d see in each disorder.
Infectious mononucleosis is characterized by an elevated white blood cell count. The majority of the white cells are lymphocytes which have an unusual appearance. These are called “reactive lymphocytes” and they appear quite different from normal lymphocytes. There are three types of reactive lymphocytes commonly seen in mono: the Downey I lymphocyte (a small lymphocyte with lobed nucleus and scant cytoplasm), the Downey II cell (a large lymphocyte with copious cytoplasm that reaches out and abuts adjacent cells), and the Downey III cell (a large lymphocyte with finely reticular chromatin and abundant cytoplasm – there’s one in the photo above).
Acute myeloid leukemia is also characterized by an elevated white blood cell count. The majority of the white cells are usually myeloblasts (the earliest precursors in the myeloid cell series), which are large cells with a high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio and very fine chromatin. Usually you’ll be able to see some nucleoli, and sometimes you can find unique structures called Auer rods (which only exist in malignant myeloid cells).
If you have a blood smear with an elevated white blood cell count, and you see lots of big cells with fine chromatin, it could be difficult to tell the two apart!
Here are some thoughts as to how you might distinguish the two:
1. First, take a look at the total white count. In infectious mononucleosis, the white count is usually moderately elevated, usually somewhere in the range of 16-20 (normal for adults is around 5-11). It rarely goes above 35.
In AML, however, the WBC is usually markedly elevated (50, or even 100 or more). Granted, if you catch the AML early in its course, the white count may be lower, but that’s a rare occurrence. So the magnitude of the leukocytosis is usually helpful.
2. Second, take a look at the cells themselves. In infectious mono, the lymphocytes are generally pretty heterogeneous. There will usually be a lot of Downey II cells, with smaller numbers of Downey I and Downey III cells.
In AML, most of the white cells will be blasts (at least 20% of the nucleated cells in the blood or bone marrow must be blasts in order to call it AML). The nature of those blasts and the percentages of other cells varies in different kinds of AML; some AMLs (like AML-M1) are composed almost completely of myeloblasts, whereas others are composed mostly of promyelocytes (AML-M3) or monoblasts (AML-M5A). But you get the idea: lots of homogeneous-appearing blasts (as opposed to the heterogeneous-appearing lymphocytes in mono).
3. Finally, take a look at the cells in question and see if you see any Auer rods. Auer rods are only found in malignant myeloid cells (almost always, they appear in myeloblasts). So if you see an Auer rod, you know you’re dealing with a myeloid malignancy, usually acute myeloid leukemia.
Those guidelines should help in most cases. If you were really stuck, even after considering these guidelines, you could get flow cytometry on the patient’s blood. That would tell you what kind of cells you were looking at (lymphoid vs. myeloid), and from that information you could work your way through the diagnostic possibilities.
- Ayomartz said This is nice! Simple and easy to comprehend, keep up the good work.
- yohannes molalign said thank you!!!
- Madiha said Very nice explanation.
- blueheather said Thank you very much for your well explanations. Yours is clearer than my professor’s.
- Dr Sagara said Grate summery…cleared problems….thanks P bites
- Vidhi motka said Love to be part of this
- Anastassia said Thanks! I’m delighted.
- Brian said *make
- Brian said Ah, I suppose that does sense, especially in light of their respective reference ranges. Thanks for...
- Kristine said Great question! I’ve never seen an explanation of this – but I think it’s because...
- Anna said Thanks a lot.yoir explanations a very easy to comprehend and remember
- Brian said Thanks for the great explanation. A thought occurred to me, though. Perhaps I’m missing someth...