Q. I am wondering if you wouldn’t mind clarifying something for me about which bacteria are actually the ones that will cause BLOODY diarrhea vs watery diarrhea. Do they necessarily have to be invasive? And with that, does invasive necessarily mean fever and systemic signs? I know this is a large question, but I feel like we have heard a few conflicting categorizations of these in addition to what it says in FirstAID.
A. Regarding classifying bugs into watery vs. bloody diarrhea: the short answer is, it depends on which source you’re looking at. Different authors classify the bugs into different categories. Some simply talk about watery vs. bloody diarrhea, and others include other descriptive categories, like “dysentery” (small volume, bloody and pus-filled stools), or “bloody watery.” Here’s a summary:
Bloody diarrhea: Shigella and certain strains of E. coli, especially EHEC. Shigella is invasive; EHEC is technically not invasive – it remains confined to the surface of the intestine where it exerts its effects through toxins (but the toxins can “invade”, getting into the bloodstream and finding their way to the kidneys). Shigella is sometimes put into a separate “dysentery” category, because the stools are not just bloody, but pus filled, and they are frequent and small in volume.
Bloody and watery diarrhea: Salmonella, Campylobacter, Yersinia. These bugs are (or can be) invasive.
Watery diarrhea: Certain strains of E. coli (like ETEC), and Vibrio cholerae. Campylobacter may also cause watery diarrhea, especially in infants. These bugs do not invade (campylobacter is capable of either invading, and causing bloody/watery diarrhea, or not invading, and causing just watery diarrhea).
The bugs listed above are the most important ones for you to remember – either because they are the most common, or because they are the most dangerous. Obviously, there are many other bugs that can cause diarrhea – and I think it may be best to think of these as simply causing diarrhea which is not particularly watery or bloody. These bugs are usually described as simply causing “enterocolitis” – which is a general term for inflammation of the intestine.
Finally, you asked about whether invasion means the patient will have systemic signs, and the answer to that is yes. Any time you have an invasive infection – meaning the bug gets into the tissue in question and causes inflammation, the patient will likely get a fever. All those inflammatory cells (particularly the neutrophils) secrete cytokines that act on the fever centers in the brain. EHEC infection, as nasty and potentially fatal as it is, does not usually present with fever, because the bugs are not technically “invasive”.
- Kristine said Thanks so much, Gina! I’m so glad you are finding something useful on Pathology Student. Thank...
- Kristine said Thanks, Dr. Shruti! I know I’ve done something right when there’s a “damn wellR...
- Kristine said Thanks so much, ssp!!
- Kristine said Good point, Hejji! I see what you’re saying – yes, you could say that the surface activa...
- Anita said Am a Ghanaian , this explanation has really helped me thanks very much
- farhad said thanks
- monti said thanks prof
- Muhammad Faate said As a medical student who is about to take STEP1 it also confused me when books said that heparin aff...
- dr.jyoti priyadarshini said Very informative Many presentations are fancy ,distracting n confusing owing to incorrect font
- Lawrence Osei-Owusu said This is academically inspiring, many thanks for sharing.
- Hejji said clearly explained. Thanks
- Hejji said Thank you Prof for this clarification. -You mentioned that the intrinsic pathway has been called so...